Original AI draft
We are thrilled to introduce a game-changing AI tool that boosts productivity for every founder. Visit our website today and try it.
Sample PostNative Report
This sample shows how PostNative turns a broad launch announcement into a more useful community discussion draft.
Issues found
- - Generic startup claims
- - Direct call to action before useful context
- - No founder reason or discussion angle
Scores
Scores run from 0 to 100. For risk scores, higher is worse. For community fit and specificity, higher is better.
AI-like tone
82/100
High risk
Higher means the draft sounds more generic or machine-polished.
Promotion risk
78/100
High risk
Higher means it may read more like an ad than a discussion.
Community fit
34/100
Low
Higher is better. Low means the draft needs more context and usefulness.
Specificity
29/100
Low
Higher is better. Low means the draft uses broad claims instead of details.
Reading this sample: the draft has high AI-like tone and high promotion risk, while community fit and specificity are low. That means it needs less hype, more founder context, and a clearer discussion angle.
Community-friendly rewrite
I built a small AI tool after noticing I kept rewriting the same launch updates for different communities. The hard part was making them sound useful instead of like product copy. Do other founders here write separate versions for each community, or do you start from one base draft?
Why this works better
The rewrite removes exaggerated claims, explains the founder context, and asks a real question that other builders can answer. It still mentions the product idea, but it does not lead with a link or a hard sell.